The Learning Professional - March 2007

                           Continuing Education for Technical Professionals

   THE LEARNING PROFESSIONALTM

           Project Performance and Career Advancement Tips

                                                                                                      Volume 5, Issue 3

In This Issue:

AuxTipsTM

The Negotiation Mentor

The Perfect Negotiation

 

Featured Consultant

Pam Rechel

 

Consensus Decision-Making

Five tips from Ken Crow

 

 

 

Now available at amazon.com:

by Steve Trautman

 

 

                                                                             About Us | Contact | Privacy

AuxTipsTM

Quick tips you can start implementing immediately.

 

Project Staffing

 

When assigning people to projects, it's important to look well-beyond the technical skills required.  When forming a team, answer these questions about each role and the individuals being considered:

 

1) What technical skills are required for completing the planned tasks?

2) Does the person have solid understanding of the processes and methodology required for this project?

3) Does he/she have a track record of excellent teamwork?

4) Will there be any difficulties communicating with others?

5) What other competencies are important for this role?

 

Answering these questions will point out potential problems that could slow down a project.  Someone else who is a better fit overall might not be available, which should be okay if skills that are lacking aren't ignored by the team.

 

Understanding the competencies that need improvement provides an opportunity to develop those skills sooner rather than later.  All too often, teams don't realize these issues until their projects are well underway.

 


The Negotiation Mentor

Tips from Preston Michie - President, Team Soup, LLC

 

The Perfect Negotiation

 

This delightful story was told to me by “Mommy” during one of my negotiation seminars.  The Chief Negotiator in this story is five year old “Emily,” a little girl with a clear goal in mind, a talent for listening carefully to her mom’s concerns, a solution oriented approach, an optimistic outlook, an ability to work past “no” and persist, willing to be flexible in attaining her goals, and a strong desire to keep Mommy happy.

 

It is one of the simplest, but rich negotiation stories I have ever heard.

 

“But Mommy, I want to wear my new red dress we bought two weeks ago!”

 

“Emily, it’s early March.  The weather is too cold.  You can wear your new red dress to school in a week or so when it warms up.”

 

“I could wear a sweater, Mommy.  That would keep me warm.”

 

“No, Emily, your legs will get cold.”

 

“What if I wore my blue tights?”

 

“Emily, the blue tights don’t go with the red dress.”

 

“Thank you, Mommy.  I’ll wear my white tights.”  As Mommy stood speechless, Emily ran off victoriously to put on the red dress, sweater, and white tights.

 

Mommy, a mother of three little girls, had sought help from other mothers attending the seminar, “I’m having trouble controlling Emily who won’t take ‘no’ for an answer.”

 

“Wait a minute,” I advised.  “Think about how well Emily handled this negotiation.”

 

Not only did Emily have a clear goal in mind, she listened carefully to Mommy’s interests (initially warmth) and proffered a solution—a sweater.  She reacted to ‘no’ by listening to the reason (lack of color coordination) and quickly offered a solution for this issue—white tights, all in the interests of making Mommy happy.

 

When she had addressed both her needs and Mommy’s needs, Emily sensed she had closed the deal and quit negotiating, all in all a flawless, brilliant negotiation performance!

 

Emily's negotiation performance serves as an example of how efficient negotiation can be when at least one party executes the fundamentals of successful negotiation.

 

Negotiations seminars:

http://www.auxiliumtraining.com/ContNeg.htm

 


Featured Consultant

 

Pam Rechel is a Myers-Briggs Type Indicator® specialist She is a Certified MBTI® Practitioner, the highest MBTI® qualification, and has MBTI® Step II experience.  She has facilitated Myers-Briggs team workshops for 11+ years in the U.S., Singapore, Taiwan, and Ireland.

 

Learn more about Pam, and how she can help your business.

 


Consensus Decision-Making

Kenneth Crow

Consensus is a decision-making process that fully utilizes the resources of a group. It is more difficult and time consuming to reach than a democratic vote or an autocratic decision. Most issues will involve trade-offs and the various decision alternatives will not satisfy everyone. Complete unanimity is not the goal -- that is rarely possible. However, it is possible for each individual to have the opportunity to express their opinion, be listened to, and accept a group decision based on its logic and feasibility considering all relevant factors. This requires the mutual trust and respect of each team member.

A consensus decision represents a reasonable decision that all members of the group can accept. It is not necessarily the optimal decision for each member. When all the group members feel this way, you have reached consensus as we have defined it. This means that a single person can block consensus if he or she feels that it is necessary.

Here are some guidelines for reaching consensus:

1) Make sure everyone is heard from and feels listened to. Avoid arguing for your own position. Present your position as clearly as possible. Listen to other team members' reactions and comments to assess their understanding of your position. Consider their reactions and comments carefully before you press your own point of view further.

2) Do not assume that someone must win and someone must lose when a discussion reaches a stalemate. Instead, look for the next most acceptable alternatives for all parties. Think creatively. Explore what possibilities exist if certain constraints were removed.

3) Do not change your mind simply to avoid conflict, to reach agreement, or maintain harmony. When agreement seems to come too quickly or easily, be suspicious. Explore the reasons and be sure that everyone accepts the solution for basically similar or complementary reasons. Yield only to positions that have objective or logically sound foundations or merits.

4) Avoid conflict-reducing techniques such as majority vote, averaging, coin toss or bargaining. When dissenting members finally agree, do not feel that they have to be rewarded or accommodated by having their own way in the future.

5) Differences of opinion are natural and expected. Seek them out, value them, and try to involve everyone in the decision process. Disagreements can improve the group's decision. With a wider range of information and opinions, there is a greater chance that the group will hit upon a more feasible or satisfactory solution.

 


Contacting Us

 

For more information about Auxilium, please visit our web site by clicking here.

 

The Learning Professional is available via e-mail on a complimentary subscription basis.  If you think you've received this email in error or do not wish to receive future emails from us, you may unsubscribe by scrolling to the end of this email and following the instructions.

 

Questions about document transmission or editorial comments? Contact feedback@auxilium-inc.com.

 

Visitors may use the information contained in this e-newsletter by placing the following credit line:

    "This article is used by permission from Auxilium's complimentary monthly e-newsletter 'The Learning Professional' available at www.auxiliumtraining.com"

This information cannot be used for resale in any manner.

 

Copyright 2007, Auxilium, Inc.  All other marks are the property of their respective owners.

 

10260 SW Greenburg Rd.

Suite 400

Portland, OR  97223